UPDATE - So Isaiah has apologized for his use of the f-word at the Golden Globes on Monday night. I think that’s fair and should be accepted by the gay mafia who called for his head on a stick. Like I said in the beginning, that’s not acceptable.
However, I did notice that Washington didn’t admit to using the f-word pre-Golden Globes…Afterall, he said he didn't do it and I am glad that he is sticking to it.
And Isaiah, if you want to meet with gays and lesbians to "heal the wounds," then might I suggest that you start with your own people and meet with the Black gay leadership. I know it's almost hard to believe there is one since the gay mafia has succeeded thus far in putting a white face to all things gay, but we are here and that's where I would start if I were you.
At the end of the day for me, this was all a witch hunt. Now that they’ve gotten their apology, let’s see the gay mafia go after one of their own, Charles Knipp a.k.a. Shirley Q. Liquor who likes to dress in blackface and mock African Americans for the pleasure of guess who, other gays…I won’t hold my breathe.
-----------------------------
This really reminds of 1876 in the Deep South, when a white woman would scream rape at the hands of a Black man, and that Black man was then dragged out of his home into the middle of the night and beaten and lynched by an angry white mob without any proof or evidence, just the word of his accuser. Since when are people guilty until proven innocent?
Paging O.J. Simpson, paging Mr. Simpson...
There’s an ensuing controversy around alleged remarks made by “Grey’s Anatomy” star Isaiah Washington towards gay co-actor T.R. Knight.
Tabloids reported that Washington used a homophobic slur in referring to gay co-star T.R. Knight. According to the National Enquirer, Washington was griping to Dempsey about Knight being late to the set when things between them became heated. It culminated in Washington reportedly choking Dempsey and barking: “I’m not your little fa**ot like T.R.!”
In the press room of the Golden Globes Monday night in Beverly Hills, the entire cast appeared on the stage to field questions. They were inevitably asked to comment on the status of things in the wake of the on-set dust-up. Before show creator Shonda Rhimes could answer, Washington grabbed the mic and blurted out: “No, I did not call T.R. a fa**ot.”
Backstage at the Golden Globes, when a question was asked about the altercation over, Washington reportedly snapped: "No, I did not call T.R. a faggot. It never happened."
According to the Hollywood Reporter, “the crowd gasped, and the rest of the press briefing was spent watching Sandra Oh trying to keep Knight from bolting the platform as he clearly was miffed by the comment.” In fact, not only was he miffed, he went straight to the "Ellen" show to tell his side of the story and basically called Washington a liar.
I knew it wasn’t going to be long before the gays attacked Washington for his alleged remarks, because until Washington says otherwise, that’s all they are.
And sure enough, here comes the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) to the rescue of who else… but Knight.
GLAAD is now demanding an apology from Washington for his using the f-word twice in the past four months to describe Knight.
In a statement to TMZ, GLAAD President Neil Giuliano said: "When Isaiah Washington uses this kind of anti-gay slur - whether on set or in front of the press - it does more than create a hostile environment for his castmates and the crew of 'Grey's Anatomy.' It also feeds a climate of hatred and intolerance that contributes to putting our community in harm's way. Washington's repeated use of it on-set and in the media is simply inexcusable."
GLAAD says it has reached out to Washington in hopes that he will agree to meet with them and discuss his actions.
"We want to sit down with him and give him an opportunity to raise public awareness about the destructive impact of these kinds of anti-gay slurs,” added Giuliano. “Over the past four months Washington has become part of a significant problem of anti-gay prejudice in this country. He now has opportunity to be part of the solution."
Note to Washington: You don’t owe anyone anything. If you didn’t say you didn’t say it then don’t let these white, and yes, I said white, gays force you into admitting to something that you did not do.
I know Isaiah Washington from his support of independent Black film. For the past seven years I have been the publicist for the Pan African Film and Arts Film Festival in Los Angeles where every year Washington participates in the twelve-day festival.
As a Black lesbian, I have never felt any indifference from Washington towards gays.
But that’s not the point.
The point is, this Black man has been tried and found guilty without any proof or admission from himself. The point is, that we are more likely to believe the white gay man over the Black man. The point is, that until Washington says otherwise he is innocent and GLAAD and all the other defenders of white gays need to step the f**k off, and yes I said it just like that.
I can almost hear it now.
“Oh he must have said it because he’s Black and you know all Black people are homophobes.”
I’d be a fool to put the words of some guy that I don’t even know, over the words of a much respected Black actor like Isaiah Washington. As a Black lesbian, he has more credibility with me than any of them.
GLAAD, you want to defend Knight? Well trust and believe that there are both Blacks and gays that will defend Washington and I am one of them.
As of now, it’s his word against Knight’s and I am not buying into the “I’m a victim” routine.
I didn’t see GLAAD running to the rescue of Black gays when Michael Richards used the n-word. I didn’t see a statement from GLAAD urging Richards to apologize for using the n-word towards Blacks. I don’t see GLAAD issuing statements urging the City of West Hollywood and gay nightclub The Factory to ban the performance of racially offensive white gay comedian Charles Knipp, whose character Shirley Q. Liquor he describes as an “inarticulate Black woman on welfare with 19 kids.” Here you have a white gay guy who promotes negative racial stereotypes of Blacks and is scheduled to perform during Black History Month in L.A.’s gay Mecca West Hollywood and a few blocks from GLAAD’s L.A. office.
So you ask yourself what’s worse, the accusation that Washington is calling someone the f-word. Or the concrete proof of a white gay man using negative stereotypes of Blacks for his own personal punch lines and making a profit off it?
And I am not arguing that Washington is innocent, he very well could be guilty, however, there’s no proof that he ever said that to Knight, at least none that’s come to light except for Knight's accusations. So it’s unfair for gay America to persecute Washington without all of the facts.
It’s true Washington used the word f-word backstage at the Golden Globes, and like the n-word, that word should never be used in any context, especially at a press conference, but that’s not what this is about. This is about an alleged comment that was made pre-Golden Globes. His use of the word f-word at the press conference is just being used to validate their argument that he also used the word towards Knight and to push their agenda.
What I see is another Black man being used by a group of people unfairly.
And so, as a Black lesbian, I dare GLAAD or anyone to call me a homophobe and tell me that I am being unfair.
If you can take Knight’s word without having all of the facts then I can take Washington’s.
So, who are you going to believe?
Isaiah, we’ll see you at the Pan African Film Festival next month and keep your head up.

Interesting points Thomas, too bad you only see it in terms of black and white, the same system you deplore in this whole debacle. Tit for tat gets no one anywhere. Instead of blaming black homophobia, of which there is way too much, just like there is way too much of it from white folks why not try and see why blacks see it as a racial trap set up by ABC and GLAAD? ABC should have handled it, if they wanted to get rid of him, they should have, instead of calling in the executive board from GLAAD to look down their noses at him, and is a joke for a group has no idea of how to deal with any black person, kind of like those who don't seem to see why GLAAD and ABC are just as out of touch with the real world as IW is.
The uproar is from the gay white community and ABC which does not want to offend them it seems, most black, gay or straight could probably care less about IW or that show as there are more pressing issues out there.
Posted by: Mimi | Thursday, January 25, 2007 at 10:21 AM
Losing Isaiah:
http://thisisthediaspora.blogspot.com/2007/01/losing-isaiah.html
Posted by: Robert | Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 07:26 PM
Jasmyne: Isaiah apologized, not just for saying the word "faggot" at the awards show... but for repeating it, i.e., he called TR Knight the ephithet as originally reported. He also lied about to try to save his own butt.
Then, he apologized - sincerely and very thoroughly, it seems. Why? I mean, he wouldn't apologize for something he didn't do, right? Because that would be a lie. Could it be that he woke up and - with integrity - said, "I did something wrong, and I truly am sorry?"
That might be a lesson for you. Trotting out an example of racism perpetrated by vile white gay people against black people is not a valid way to address the issue, because COUNTLESS examples of vile black homophobia against gay people of all colors can be brought forth with a mouse click. And then are we closer to knowing what Isaiah did or how he should making amends? Nope. All you did was muddy the waters, and now that you've been proven wrong, perhaps it's time to make amends.
Posted by: Thomas | Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 01:27 PM
Thanks for snapping your fingers with your reply. You can have your take on it, and I can have mine.
I for one havenever said what IW did was right, I just don't see why the Glaad group is involved. I don't wathc the show, and nor wil lI satrt, with or without IW, since I prefer my novellas on Spanish speaking tv. If, ABC wants to fire him, let them make the choice, not be railroaded into it by a group with no real mission other than to force thier agenda off onto others.
And, as far as being called a "n-word by the white gays, you have got to be kidding, they already call you that,just not to your face. So, the catty tone should be towards them.
Posted by: Mimi | Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 11:13 AM
I hate what IW said. I don't care if the victim in this case is white.
GLADD has nothing to do with how I feel, but if they get IW fired more power to them.
Posted by: edwin | Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 09:56 AM
Mimi,
How do you take it that I work for GLAAD, that lily white organization that doesn't give a rat's ass about me or my issues? You, ma'am, presume too much. Had you the decency to ASK me who I was instead of ASSUMING who I was, perhaps I would have been able to tell you that I'm a BLACK grad student at Brooklyn College who fights homophobia and racism wherever he finds it. But apparently, you're not interested. You're just interested in protecting Isaiah at any cost, even if it means defending a homophobe. As I see it, Isaiah asked me to choose: are you Black or are you gay? And it seems that many of you are asking me to do the same thing. Well, let me just tell you: I don't like being called a nigger by Whites and I don't like being called a faggot by Blacks. So, MY CHOICE is to tell you BOTH where to go when you do it. I'm not falling in line because you tell me I should. I don't do it when Whites command it and I'm not doing it when Blacks command it. If you can't handle that, you can't handle me. PERIOD.
Posted by: Robert | Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 08:06 AM
Robert,I take it you work for GLAAD and similar organizations, or support them with what they want, money but, more power to you and their fight. Maybe I'll go along with your train of thought when they become inclusive and not have a couple of blacks, a security guard and one with a job which has nothing to do with the actual group, other than sit around and let them claim they are ell for equality.
And, somehow I doubt if you not supporting him will mean anything, you and the ones who are so out for his head don't amount to that much power, the rest of America has moved on, there are real issues out there besides a rich black man who made a slur and the rich gay white people who want him fired.
My gripe is that they are hypocrites, and that's obvious by the anti-black remarks their core base has made on this unfortunate issue and the SQL debacle.
Posted by: Mimi | Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 06:56 AM
I don't care how many brothers implore me to forgive him and move on, I'm not doing it. I don't care if Isaiah apologized. Michael Richards apologized and I don't think he's any less a racist because of it. He apologized because he fears that his career would be at risk if he didn't. And I'm of the mind that Isaiah was similarly motivated. So, no, he doesn't get a pass. I think he's a homophobe and I imagine what he's really sorry about is that he was exposed as one. Yes, he's entitled to his opinion and to say whatever words he chooses within the limits of the law. But you know what? I'm ALSO entitled to stop supporting him and his work, just like I stopped supporting Michael Richards and his work. That policy doesn't shift just because Isaiah's Black and I'm Black. I have to let him help oppress me with his homophobia just because we're both oppressed by racism? No. I'm not down with that. So yeah, Isaiah. Go get therapy. I'll check you when you've gone through it. But right now? I don't SEE you
Posted by: Robert | Tuesday, January 23, 2007 at 08:09 PM
Rosie O'Donnell should be fired for just being Rosie O'Donnell, queen of insensitivity. Her remarks about Asians spoke of her true feelings about people who are not like her. Which is why it was great to see Trump call her out for what she is, a BULLY. She has to be one of the most negative people on television today, but, since she gets the ratings that ABC needs to get the sponsors to pay, she is "safe" from the wrath of Glaad.
About the 6 black guys who were shot, don't think for one minute that GLAAD, HRC or any of the white gays give a hoot about them. Why? They don't write checks to the groups or are obsessed with the gay marriage stuff.
Posted by: Mimi | Tuesday, January 23, 2007 at 09:50 AM
Jasmye,
Thank you very much for stepping up to defend Isaiah Washington and pointing out vehemently that this issue has unfortunately become a matter of race side. He was wrong to have said whatever he said but he was man enough to apologize and make overtures to make amends. TR Knight on the other hand was not man enough to say whatever he had to say to Isaiah's face and settle this personal issue maturely man to man. Instead he played the victim for the media to use as a pawn in their media circus and witchhunt.
Nobody is above a mistake or lapse in judgement and everbody deserve forgivness.
Please get word of this petition out there more so we can get more signatures. Apparently the petition to fire him is going to be sent to ABC- it is up to 18,000 signatures. There are more people out there who want him to stay so we need to get the word out there especially in the black community to stand for him as he is being used as a scapegoat and being hung out to dry.
If he is fired Rosie O Donnel should be fired as well she attacks public figures everyday on national TV and thus creating a hostile environment for the whole country but nobody is getting bent out of shape because of that.
America is full of hypocrisy and double standard all around esp in light of the New Year's incident mentioned in above.
Posted by: Ollyt | Tuesday, January 23, 2007 at 07:49 AM
Six young Black Men were shot on New Years Day in Chicago it was infereed that they were Gay, where is the outcry and indignation for them? Where is the NBJC,GLAAD,NAACP. Who is fighting for their self respect. This is the Biggest Gay Story of the Year !!!!! WHERE IS EVERYBODY????????
Posted by: Ron Lee | Tuesday, January 23, 2007 at 07:04 AM
Jasmye, you and me both are not easily fooled by the gay mafia in Hollywood. They are silent on many issues involving black gay men and women, but will readily jump at the defense of T.R. Knight without hearing both sides. Shirley Q Liquor has been around and performing for years and not one word about that minstrel show.
What about the group of gay black men who were shot at a New Year's Party? Why no outrage there? You mean GLAAD and other white gay organizations are only concerned about a bitter argument on the set of a show? This whole controversy is laughable.
I'm not excusing Isiah's behaviour at all because he should be reprimanded, however I really don't understand why black folks act like these people who are ranting really have their best interest at heart.
Posted by: Luke | Tuesday, January 23, 2007 at 06:16 AM
Cadence, instead of bashing anyone who does not agree with you, why not check out today's NY Times, where the beloved GLAAD guy says he wants IW's head.Let ABC deal with this issue, after all, aren't they the ones who employ the man?
And, while you are at it, can you or any of the ones who seem to have never made a mistake, show us just what GLAAD stands for, other than white gays? Do they even have a diversity program? I'm sure you would know as you seem to be on their board.
Thanks in advance.
Posted by: Mimi | Monday, January 22, 2007 at 12:46 PM
Although you have a right to your opinion, Mr. Washington was wrong to have used the word "faggot" to refer to Homosexuals/gay community.
He is lucky to be on a top number one show in the first place. I am very aware of his work and others work with Babu's PAFF, and perhaps I even know you!
As a lesbian would you want to be referred to as a "DIKE" "BUTCH" "MUNCHER" and all the other names ignorant people use to degrade that which they deem as "unnatural" and "sick?"
But, that is not even the main thrust here with Mr. Washingtons comment. The fact that he would use the word on national television is what is at fault in my opinion. He may not have said it or he may have said it, but we all know that he used the word because we all heard him.
It makes no sense for a sister (Shonda) to have created a top show (she was trying to answeer the question but Mr. Washington moved into the mic), and have one of her actors/talent to show his ignorance, because that is what it was, pure ignorance.
Posted by: LizzyRoux | Sunday, January 21, 2007 at 08:49 PM
I think it's funny that the petition says every since October there has been a strong drive to get Washington fired. We'll just pretend that Wednesday wasn't the first time that GLAAD issued a public statement about the situation. Or, that instead of asking that Washington be fired, GLAAD said they wanted to speak with him, so that he could understand why his words are hurtful. And, we'll just forget that since November, this situation hasn't been mentioned, by anyone. And until this week there were no petitions or drives to get IW fired. We'll just forget all of that, because it is more important to stres that this is just another case of the White man trying to make a Black man grovel.
Posted by: Cadence | Sunday, January 21, 2007 at 04:11 PM
By the way, Mr. Unite Us, please do yourself and the rest us a favor and research how HIV is passed from person to person.
Posted by: Cadence | Sunday, January 21, 2007 at 03:10 PM
Mr. Unite Us, how can you say this is what happened, where you there? At the Golden Globes Shonda Rhimes was asked if reporters were lying about what happend. She said, no. You can read a transcript of this at eonline.com, it's in the naked truth section, and is reported on by Ted Casablanca, who is the one who asked the question that resulted in I. Washington acting like a fool. All reports agree that Washington said referred to TR with that word.
We are no better than GlAAD or the Charles Knipp supporters, if we start re-writing the facts just because I. Washington is Black. Doing that isn't going to get us anywhere.
Posted by: Cadence | Sunday, January 21, 2007 at 03:08 PM
Washington arguing with Dempsey said,
I'm not your faggot.
Knight overheard and assumed Washington called him a faggot.
Knight has his own sexual identity issues in that he chose to hide the fact that he was gay, until this controvery came to light. Because of the high incidence of AIDs/HIV among homosexuals and the women some of them choose to have sex with, I hope that Knight informed his female co-workers prior to shooting intimate scenes with them.
Remember what Rock Hudson did and didn't do?
Those concerned should rent the movie
Spike Lee's Get on the Bus. Washington
plays the role of gay man with respect and dignity. There was none of the buffonish queenery many in Hollywood love to see Black men portray.
P.S.
Just heard about Knip. He needs to be nipped in the bud.
Posted by: Mr. Unite Us | Saturday, January 20, 2007 at 09:47 AM
Ryan, thank you for your honest input, but, sorry, since when has the gay community been inclusive? The only time I see it is when they have print ads for something. The two id's rule for black men was still in effect in San Francisco as late as last year until a boycott called the owner out for it and the city and state got involved.I'm probaly much older than you are, and can still recall certain clubs that had rules to keep gay women out of them. The "dl" thing is a myth of the media, so, I don't agree with you there. As far as the "straight acting", go to any personals site, and 95% of the men there are claiming this, and not just black men.
Good grief, in this day and age, you can't find a black man on the cover or even in an article in a gay publication, with Frontiers in LA being one of the rare exceptions. The reason given, their "audience" doesn't relate to black men. Then, you have a white drag queen in black face, offensive to most blacks and quite a few whites as well, yet, not a peep from the so called gay community.
All that said, black men have to stand up and be black, gay and proud in our own community, since if they wait for the rest of the gay community to take the time to understand our issues, we will be waiting for a long time, as most people don't have the time or interest to understand the unique cultural difference of gays of color, and , by color, I don't just mean blacks.
Posted by: | Saturday, January 20, 2007 at 07:53 AM
NYDYK,
"I agree that the white gay movement (and its organizations) has a double standard and has for too long done poorly on people of color issues (with the notable exception of NGLTF, especially when Urvashi was head of it)."
Well, when the black gay male community is willing to be out and proud, instead of married, straight-acting,or on the down low, then they will fulfill thier own potential and be the equals that they are. It is the black gay male community that is holding themselves back. The gay community in general is inclusive.
Posted by: Ryan | Friday, January 19, 2007 at 09:00 PM
Wow, nydyke, powerful words, and one of the few posts I have read that actually makes sense, although I don't agree with the Jasmyne diss. Homophobia is no different in the black community as it is in every other community, but, when you factor in 400 years of oppression, 9 out of 10 blacks will stick together on a issue such as this when you have GLAAD on its usual smear campaign, even when we know IW was wrong. However, I don't see why he has to correct his relationship with gays, black or white with GLAAD, its not as if, they have tried to do anyhting with or for black gays.
But, power to you, one of the few anti IW posters who actually has a clue, and as far as the gay white establishment, I for one don't see why they even exist, why don't they change their name, since, they are only concerned with fellow whites.
Posted by: Ty | Friday, January 19, 2007 at 05:24 PM
As a black out proud lesbian I have lost all respect for your intellectual honesty and ethical compass, Jasmyne. As someone who (from NYC) reads your blog faithfully, and even signed up to contribute every month to NBJC at your request, I am very disappointed. NOTHING excuses Washington from his use of the word Faggot, not even the fact that he is black. Just like NOTHING excuses someone like Shirley Q Liquor (or the media's and gay organization's inattention to the performance), not even the fact that she is an "outsider" (gay).
Your reasoning is just plain SLOPPY and hiding behind race (as many black gays do when it comes to confronting homophobia) is a poor, poor excuse for our tendency (as black gays) to cut off our noses to spite our face.. The fact that Washington is black does not and should not excuse his homophobia, something you are quick to explain away. Shame on you!
I agree that the white gay movement (and its organizations) has a double standard and has for too long done poorly on people of color issues (with the notable exception of NGLTF, especially when Urvashi was head of it). But that does not mean that we have to stoop to their level and ignore what is clearly wrong here. Just call a spade a spade. Washington is infected by homophobia like the rest of the world and he is right to apologize and take steps to correct his relationship with gays (including, and most particularly, black gays). We should demand nothing else.
Posted by: nydyke | Friday, January 19, 2007 at 04:45 PM
Jasmyne, be serious...
I too have the utmost respect and regard for Washington as a deeply talented black male actor, I haven't forgotten his gay role in "Get On The Bus", etc. And I definitely DON'T want him fired or shunned by the industry in terms of future jobs... but you can't tell me that the majority of his co stars, crew, and onlookers are just making this up that he dropped the f-bomb because they're racist?!?! I agree with you that GLAAD is often petty and misguided, but that doesn't change the fact that sumthin ain't right about his story.
Posted by: jbyrd130 | Friday, January 19, 2007 at 02:39 PM
You are ABSOLUTELY wrong about this issue. Your lack of journalism skills and professionalism can not let you see beyond the issue of race. GLAAD doesn't necessarily need to go after Shirley Liquor. Is this a media issue?? Why wouldn't HRC go after her?
The Grey's Anatomy issue is indeed a media issue.
FOCUS. You obviously lack intelligence and it is a shame that you are using a public forum to spread your stupid analysis. I wonder what the National Black Justice Coalition: the board you serve for, would say about your ignorant rants?
A message for the National Black Justice Coalition:
HOW CAN YOU HAVE JASMYNE REPRESENT THE ONLY BLACK LGBT ORGANIZATION IN THE COUNTRY??
Posted by: La Shonda Wilkins | Friday, January 19, 2007 at 09:21 AM
Hypocritical Spirtis, that's a great name for you. Ignoring the fact that you are referencing a tv show, following your logic it is okay for White people to use the word the N-word, because it's used so much by Black rappers and other Black people on a daily basis.
Posted by: Cadence | Friday, January 19, 2007 at 08:09 AM